CANADA DIVORCE LAWYERS are
professionals that specialize in
Canadian divorce matters.
|
Canada
did not have a federal divorce law until 1968. Before that time, the
process for getting a divorce varied from province to province. In
Newfoundland and Quebec, it was necessary to get a private Act of Parliament
in order to end a marriage.
The federal Divorce Act of 1968 standardized the law
of divorce across Canada and introduced the no-fault concept of permanent
marriage breakdown as a ground for divorce as well as fault based grounds
including adultery, cruelty and desertion.
In Canada, while civil and political rights
are in the jurisdiction of the provinces, the Constitution of Canada
specifically made marriage and divorce the realm of the federal
government.
Essentially this means that
Canada's divorce law is uniform throughout Canada, even in Quebec, that
differs from the other provinces in its use of the civil law as codified in
the Civil Code of Quebec as opposed to the common law that is in force in
the other provinces and generally interpreted in similar ways throughout the
Anglo-Canadian provinces.
The Canada Divorce Act recognizes divorce only on the ground of
breakdown of the marriage. Breakdown can only be established if one of three
grounds hold: adultery, cruelty, and being separated for one year. Most
divorces proceed on the basis of the spouses being separated for one year,
even if there has been cruelty or adultery. This is because proving cruelty
or adultery is expensive and time consuming.
The one-year period of
separation starts from the time at least one spouse intends to live separate
and apart from the other and acts on it. A couple does not need a court
order to be separated, since there is no such thing as a "legal separation"
in Canada. A couple can even be considered to be "separated" even if they
are living in the same dwelling. Either spouse can apply for a divorce in
the province in which either the husband or wife has lived for at least one
year.
On September 13, 2004, the Ontario Court of Appeal declared a portion of the
Divorce Act also unconstitutional for excluding same-sex marriages, which at
the time of the decision were recognized in three provinces and one
territory. It ordered same-sex marriages read into that act, permitting the
plaintiffs, a lesbian couple, to divorce.
|